Even though the current recession is not the Great Depression, certain parallels can be drawn.  As learned from the 1930s, during economic recessions protectionist measures become more likely.  There is a high awareness of this threat both in politics and the public, and the WTO is closely following crisis responses of its member states, publishing reports on protectionist barriers.  In the 1930s the leading industrialized nations responded to the crisis by imposing trade barriers on imports and raising the tariffs. This time protectionism has been kept at bay, at least when it comes to tariff barriers. However, the economic stimulus packages passed by major industrialized countries contain subsidies and buy-local clauses that have the potential to seriously distort competition and thus harm international trade.

Not all subsidies are bad.  There are different forms of subsidies with different effects on domestic markets and international trade. They are necessary to stabilise consumption and production, help weakened economies to recover, stabilize international trade, etc. However, some of them pose a great danger to distort trade by creating unequal conditions of competition.  Contrary to limiting the use of tariffs, the WTO’s toolbox to controlling subsidies is less well equipped. Within the EU, subsidies are causing tensions but the European Commission has more advanced instruments and more power to intervene than the WTO has in the global context. Read the rest of this entry »

Everybody knows it: the EU is a secular institution, which doesn’t have legal competence in religious matters. Moreover, its cooperation with non-state actors is based on the principle of non-discrimination, meaning that the EU should not discriminate any actor on the basis of its secular or religious nature. I was reminded of these two EU fundaments several times during interviews with EU officials last and this year.

In reality, is the separation between the EU and religion that clear? My experience is that while separation seems to be the case on paper and in many policy areas, there are also indications of emerging patterns of timid cooperation between EU institutions and religious actors, both religious leaders and grassroots representatives, in internal and external EU policies. However, this knowledge doesn’t seem to be fully acknowledged, internalised, nor reflected upon in current EU policy-making. Read the rest of this entry »

The Lisbon Treaty has now been ratified by 25 Member States. If, as we hope, it is ratified by the end of the year, and if the Treaty enters into force by the beginning of 2010, the changes that the Treaty brings about will mean a more efficient Europe, a more transparent Europe, and a more democratic Europe, to the benefit of all European citizens.

Europe’s major problem at the moment is that the current rules and voting methods are meant for a European Union of 15 Member States, not of 27.  The Lisbon Treaty gives Europe the right tools to be efficient with 27 Member States.

Read the rest of this entry »